
I've regained my focus after a fall of mostly thinking and writing about art without actually completing any new work for my
Reading a Garden series. Why this sudden change? I'm having a solo show of this series at the Leyton Gallery of Fine Art at the end of May, 2010. Deadlines are a great thing!
I need 20 paintings for the show in May. I have 14 almost completed. My problem is that the wildflower meadow, an important part of my experiences at Birr Castle Demesne, is now unrepresented in the series. Both wildflower meadow paintings from the garden series have sold.
The wildflower meadow was my personal link with the Demesne. It was the kind of garden I understood. After I came back from Ireland, I photographed the meadow around my summer house as a point of comparison (see previous post). I've decided to replace the

two meadow paintings with a new one created with reference material from my own wildflower meadow. This new piece will be a bridge from here to Ireland, from my earlier life to my stay at the Demesne. I understand meadows; they are not foreign, structured or inaccessible. Wildflowers are much the same everywhere.

Certainly meadows are not exactly new content for painters. It is the predictability of the imagery that I am attracted to. The first reproduction I ever purchased was Durer's Tall Grasses. The close up view was one I understood and was attracted to. I like the focused examination of things most people ignore. There is no doubt that this little work had a big impact on my later development as an artist.
How have other artists interpreted the meadow?
Meadow, oil on canvas, 74 x 80 in. Michael Brophy, 2007
G. Gibson Gallery
Summer Meadow, oil on canvas, 100 x 130 cm. Beth Wintgens
Carina Haslan Fine Art
Meadow, 2006, oil and gesso
Jo Miller
Meadow, 2008, 24 x 2o in. oil on canvas
Karina Drogowska
Meadow Walk, 11 x 14,
Donna Day WestermanOne subject, many interpretations.
What are your preferences?